[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180509163939.GA26347@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 18:39:40 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Francis Deslauriers <francis.deslauriers@...icios.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] uprobes: x86: Prohibit probing on MOV SS instruction
On 05/09, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> Since MOV SS and POP SS instructions will delay the exceptions
> until the next instruction is executed, we should not do
> single-stepping on it by uprobes.
...
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,10 @@ static int uprobe_init_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn, bool
> if (is_prefix_bad(insn))
> return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> + /* We should not singlestep on the exception masking instructions */
> + if (insn_masking_exception(insn))
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists