[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d0y4z6cx.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 10:45:02 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the powerpc-fixes tree
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
>
> between commit:
>
> edf6a2dfe388 ("powerpc/trace/syscalls: Update syscall name matching logic to account for ppc_ prefix")
>
> from the powerpc-fixes tree and commit:
>
> c3e59d778403 ("powerpc64/ftrace: Rearrange #ifdef sections in ftrace.h")
>
> from the powerpc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> Michael, I think the version in your merge branch is not quite right ...
Yep.
Don't do merges after midnight kids.
I've pushed a fixed version, which I think matches yours.
I'll resolve it in my next when I merge my fixes & next later in the
cycle.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists