[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180510093846.184f6de0@lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 09:38:46 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] wait: wait.h: Get rid of a kernel-doc/Sphinx
warnings
On Thu, 10 May 2018 11:21:13 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org> wrote:
> The problem with a hint-based mechanism is that it will generate
> false hints. If added, we may end by needing to add extra tags to
> disable the hints mechanism where it gets wrong, or to periodically
> do code changes at kernel-doc comments in order to make the hints
> logic happy.
>
> So, IMO, we should provide non-hints based mechanism, like forcing the
> string that prepends the colon to have a keyword that will make it to
> parse the block as literal, where expressions like:
>
> See the code-block foo:
> See the following code example:
> See the following flow diagram:
> See the following artwork:
>
> Is the best alternative to avoid "::", as on the enclosed patch.
But this, too, is a hint-based mechanism. Thanks for the patches, I'll
keep them around, but I would like an opportunity to try to do better
before applying them. I fear that using magic words in this way will
lead to a constant stream of surprises, and I'd like to avoid that if
possible...
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists