linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/18] wait: wait.h: Get rid of a kernel-doc/Sphinx warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180510134249.64445281@vento.lan>
Date:   Thu, 10 May 2018 13:42:58 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] wait: wait.h: Get rid of a kernel-doc/Sphinx
 warnings

Em Thu, 10 May 2018 09:38:46 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:

> On Thu, 10 May 2018 11:21:13 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > The problem with a hint-based mechanism is that it will generate
> > false hints. If added, we may end by needing to add extra tags to
> > disable the hints mechanism where it gets wrong, or to periodically
> > do code changes at kernel-doc comments in order to make the hints
> > logic happy.
> > 
> > So, IMO, we should provide non-hints based mechanism, like forcing the
> > string that prepends the colon to have a keyword that will make it to
> > parse the block as literal, where expressions like:
> > 
> > 	See the code-block foo:
> > 	See the following code example:
> > 	See the following flow diagram:
> > 	See the following artwork:
> > 
> > Is the best alternative to avoid "::", as on the enclosed patch.  
> 
> But this, too, is a hint-based mechanism.  Thanks for the patches, I'll
> keep them around, but I would like an opportunity to try to do better
> before applying them.  I fear that using magic words in this way will
> lead to a constant stream of surprises, and I'd like to avoid that if
> possible...

Yes, it is still hint-based. A careful selection of the "magic spell
words/phrases" would minimize the risks of false positives, but it
could still lead into some unwanted surprises.

IMO, "::" (or some other character combination that is not used
elsewhere) is still the safest option.


Thanks,
Mauro