[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1526340837-12222-12-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 16:33:50 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com,
will.deacon@....com, peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk,
luc.maranget@...ia.fr, akiyks@...il.com,
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH memory-model 12/19] tools/memory-model: Remove duplicated code from lock.cat
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
This patch simplifies the implementation of spin_is_locked in the
LKMM. It capitalizes on the fact that a failed spin_trylock() and a
spin_is_locked() which returns True have exactly the same semantics
(those of READ_ONCE) and ordering properties (none). Therefore the
two kinds of events can be combined and handled by the same code,
instead of treated separately as they are currently.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
CC: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
CC: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
CC: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>
CC: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>
CC: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
---
tools/memory-model/lock.cat | 28 ++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/lock.cat b/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
index 3b1439edc818..1f6d67e79065 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
+++ b/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
@@ -41,11 +41,15 @@ flag ~empty [FW] ; loc ; [ALL-LOCKS] as lock-final
*)
let RL = try RL with emptyset (* defined herd7 >= 7.49 *)
let RU = try RU with emptyset (* defined herd7 >= 7.49 *)
+
+(* Treat RL as a kind of LF: a read with no ordering properties *)
+let LF = LF | RL
+
(*
* Put lock operations in their appropriate classes, but leave UL out of W
* until after the co relation has been generated.
*)
-let R = R | LKR | LF | RL | RU
+let R = R | LKR | LF | RU
let W = W | LKW
let Release = Release | UL
@@ -80,28 +84,8 @@ let all-possible-rfe-lf =
(* Generate all rf relations for LF events *)
with rfe-lf from cross(all-possible-rfe-lf)
-
let rf-lf = rfe-lf | rfi-lf
-(* rf for RL events, ie islocked returning true, similar to LF above *)
-
-(* islocked returning true inside a critical section
- * must read from the opening lock
- *)
-let rfi-rl = ([LKW] ; po-loc ; [RL]) \ ([LKW] ; po-loc ; [UL] ; po-loc)
-
-(* islocked returning true outside critical sections can match any
- * external lock.
- *)
-let all-possible-rfe-rl =
- let possible-rfe-lf r =
- let pair-to-relation p = p ++ 0
- in map pair-to-relation ((LKW * {r}) & loc & ext)
- in map possible-rfe-lf (RL \ range(rfi-rl))
-
-with rfe-rl from cross(all-possible-rfe-rl)
-let rf-rl = rfe-rl | rfi-rl
-
(* Read from unlock, ie islocked returning false, slightly different *)
(* islocked returning false can read from the last po-previous unlock *)
@@ -118,7 +102,7 @@ with rfe-ru from cross(all-possible-rfe-ru)
let rf-ru = rfe-ru | rfi-ru
(* Final rf relation *)
-let rf = rf | rf-lf | rf-rl | rf-ru
+let rf = rf | rf-lf | rf-ru
(* Generate all co relations, including LKW events but not UL *)
let co0 = co0 | ([IW] ; loc ; [LKW]) |
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists