| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1526340837-12222-13-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 16:33:51 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com,
will.deacon@....com, peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk,
luc.maranget@...ia.fr, akiyks@...il.com,
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH memory-model 13/19] tools/memory-model: Improve comments in lock.cat
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
This patch improves the comments in tools/memory-model/lock.cat. In
addition to making the text more uniform and removing redundant
comments, it adds a description of all the possible locking events
that herd can generate.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
CC: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
CC: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
CC: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>
CC: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>
CC: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
---
tools/memory-model/lock.cat | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/memory-model/lock.cat b/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
index 1f6d67e79065..df74de2148f6 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
+++ b/tools/memory-model/lock.cat
@@ -4,15 +4,35 @@
* Copyright (C) 2017 Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
*)
-(* Generate coherence orders and handle lock operations *)
(*
- * Warning, crashes with herd7 versions strictly before 7.48.
- * spin_islocked is functional from version 7.49.
+ * Generate coherence orders and handle lock operations
*
+ * Warning: spin_is_locked() crashes herd7 versions strictly before 7.48.
+ * spin_is_locked() is functional from herd7 version 7.49.
*)
+
include "cross.cat"
-(* From lock reads to their partner lock writes *)
+(*
+ * The lock-related events generated by herd are as follows:
+ *
+ * LKR Lock-Read: the read part of a spin_lock() or successful
+ * spin_trylock() read-modify-write event pair
+ * LKW Lock-Write: the write part of a spin_lock() or successful
+ * spin_trylock() RMW event pair
+ * UL Unlock: a spin_unlock() event
+ * LF Lock-Fail: a failed spin_trylock() event
+ * RL Read-Locked: a spin_is_locked() event which returns True
+ * RU Read-Unlocked: a spin_is_locked() event which returns False
+ *
+ * LKR and LKW events always come paired, like all RMW event sequences.
+ *
+ * LKR, LF, RL, and RU are read events; LKR has Acquire ordering.
+ * LKW and UL are write events; UL has Release ordering.
+ * LKW, LF, RL, and RU have no ordering properties.
+ *)
+
+(* Link Lock-Reads to their RMW-partner Lock-Writes *)
let lk-rmw = ([LKR] ; po-loc ; [LKW]) \ (po ; po)
let rmw = rmw | lk-rmw
@@ -29,18 +49,16 @@ flag ~empty LKW \ range(lk-rmw) as unpaired-LKW
(* This will be allowed if we implement spin_is_locked() *)
flag ~empty LKR \ domain(lk-rmw) as unpaired-LKR
-(* There should be no R or W accesses to spinlocks *)
+(* There should be no ordinary R or W accesses to spinlocks *)
let ALL-LOCKS = LKR | LKW | UL | LF
flag ~empty [M \ IW] ; loc ; [ALL-LOCKS] as mixed-lock-accesses
(* The final value of a spinlock should not be tested *)
flag ~empty [FW] ; loc ; [ALL-LOCKS] as lock-final
-(*
- * Backward compatibility
- *)
-let RL = try RL with emptyset (* defined herd7 >= 7.49 *)
-let RU = try RU with emptyset (* defined herd7 >= 7.49 *)
+(* Backward compatibility *)
+let RL = try RL with emptyset
+let RU = try RU with emptyset
(* Treat RL as a kind of LF: a read with no ordering properties *)
let LF = LF | RL
@@ -55,7 +73,6 @@ let W = W | LKW
let Release = Release | UL
let Acquire = Acquire | LKR
-
(* Match LKW events to their corresponding UL events *)
let critical = ([LKW] ; po-loc ; [UL]) \ (po-loc ; [LKW | UL] ; po-loc)
@@ -65,7 +82,6 @@ flag ~empty UL \ range(critical) as unmatched-unlock
let UNMATCHED-LKW = LKW \ domain(critical)
empty ([UNMATCHED-LKW] ; loc ; [UNMATCHED-LKW]) \ id as unmatched-locks
-
(* rfi for LF events: link each LKW to the LF events in its critical section *)
let rfi-lf = ([LKW] ; po-loc ; [LF]) \ ([LKW] ; po-loc ; [UL] ; po-loc)
@@ -86,18 +102,23 @@ let all-possible-rfe-lf =
with rfe-lf from cross(all-possible-rfe-lf)
let rf-lf = rfe-lf | rfi-lf
-(* Read from unlock, ie islocked returning false, slightly different *)
+(*
+ * RU, i.e., spin_is_locked() returning False, is slightly different.
+ * We rely on the memory model to rule out cases where spin_is_locked()
+ * within one of the lock's critical sections returns False.
+ *)
-(* islocked returning false can read from the last po-previous unlock *)
+(* rfi for RU events: an RU may read from the last po-previous UL *)
let rfi-ru = ([UL] ; po-loc ; [RU]) \ ([UL] ; po-loc ; [LKW] ; po-loc)
-(* any islocked returning false can read from any external unlock *)
+(* rfe for RU events: an RU may read from an external UL or the initial write *)
let all-possible-rfe-ru =
let possible-rfe-ru r =
let pair-to-relation p = p ++ 0
in map pair-to-relation (((UL|IW) * {r}) & loc & ext)
in map possible-rfe-ru RU
+(* Generate all rf relations for RU events *)
with rfe-ru from cross(all-possible-rfe-ru)
let rf-ru = rfe-ru | rfi-ru
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists