[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180514022309.GA9220@sejong>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:23:09 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Yann Ylavic <ylavic.dev@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@...rsys.com>,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/10] tracing: Have zero size length in filter
logic be full string
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 08:32:18PM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> []
> >
> > static int regex_match_front(char *str, struct regex *r, int len)
> > {
> > - if (len < r->len)
> > + if (len && len < r->len)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - if (strncmp(str, r->pattern, r->len) == 0)
> > - return 1;
> > - return 0;
> > + return strncmp(str, r->pattern, len) == 0;
>
> strncmp(..., r->len) still?
Yep, I think so. Otherwise it'll always return true when len is 0.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists