[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-fc7bdc90249b216051d06496577c306327f2e3f5@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 23:24:52 -0700
From: tip-bot for SeongJae Park <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
sj38.park@...il.com, will.deacon@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/Documentation: Fix incorrect example
code
Commit-ID: fc7bdc90249b216051d06496577c306327f2e3f5
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/fc7bdc90249b216051d06496577c306327f2e3f5
Author: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 15:55:32 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 15 May 2018 08:11:14 +0200
locking/Documentation: Fix incorrect example code
- Remove a stale line of code
- Fix the condition of the READ_ONCE() example
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: akiyks@...il.com
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: j.alglave@....ac.uk
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: luc.maranget@...ia.fr
Cc: npiggin@...il.com
Cc: parri.andrea@...il.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526338533-6044-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
index fce929144ccd..4ea4af71e68a 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
@@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ If the compiler can prove that do_something() does not store to the
variable a, then the compiler is within its rights transforming this to
the following::
- tmp = a;
if (a > 0)
for (;;)
do_something();
@@ -119,7 +118,7 @@ the following::
If you don't want the compiler to do this (and you probably don't), then
you should use something like the following::
- while (READ_ONCE(a) < 0)
+ while (READ_ONCE(a) > 0)
do_something();
Alternatively, you could place a barrier() call in the loop.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists