[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdU0iUBbkPL5ZKxKuORnQA9ujX1J+5NLw=ft80hJh20VxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 12:54:22 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@...eup.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the netfilter-next tree
Hi Florian,
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 May 2018 10:55:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > After merging the netfilter-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> > allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>> >
>> > ./usr/include/linux/netfilter/nf_osf.h:25: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
>>
>> > Introduced by commit
>> >
>> > bfb15f2a95cb ("netfilter: extract Passive OS fingerprint infrastructure from xt_osf")
>
> I'll send a fix for this, thanks for reporting.
+config NF_OSF
+ tristate 'Passive OS fingerprint infrastructure'
"There is no help available for this option."
Is this meant to be a user-visible symbol?
I noticed it is selected by NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OSF.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists