linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the netfilter-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180515175123.ncxzaaexp3ehcpwx@breakpoint.cc>
Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 19:51:23 +0200
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@...eup.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the netfilter-next tree

Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 7 May 2018 10:55:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > After merging the netfilter-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >> > allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >> >
> >> > ./usr/include/linux/netfilter/nf_osf.h:25: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
> >>
> >> > Introduced by commit
> >> >
> >> >   bfb15f2a95cb ("netfilter: extract Passive OS fingerprint infrastructure from xt_osf")
> >
> > I'll send a fix for this, thanks for reporting.
> 
> +config NF_OSF
> +       tristate 'Passive OS fingerprint infrastructure'
> 
> "There is no help available for this option."
> 
> Is this meant to be a user-visible symbol?

No, its not.  I can send a patch in case you're too busy, let me know.