[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1526401576.5391.2.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 17:26:16 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: x86 <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/15] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split
locked accesses
> Could you describe the performance degradation? Why is this not a
> "doctor it hurts when I do that" situation?
They already know it hurts - the question is why and where.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists