[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASNMZbz=re1sRzh8Ffkt8g78=ddV7d_TZm4MVq1+JS-hA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 15:01:38 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree
Stephen,
2018-05-15 14:50 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>:
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> After merging the kbuild tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> modules_install) failed like this:
>
> Usage: scripts/depmod.sh /sbin/depmod <kernelrelease> <symbolprefix>
> Makefile:1314: recipe for target '_modinst_post' failed
>
> Caused by commit
>
> ea7ad9856a2c ("depmod.sh: remove symbol prefix support")
>
> I added the following fix for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 15:47:33 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] depmod.sh: fix syntax check and uage message
>
> fixes: ea7ad9856a2c ("depmod.sh: remove symbol prefix support")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
Thanks for catching this.
How should I handle your fix-up?
May I squash into the original one if you ack to do it,
or is it better to keep it as a separate patch?
> scripts/depmod.sh | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/depmod.sh b/scripts/depmod.sh
> index 421d1aa01304..1a6f85e0e6e1 100755
> --- a/scripts/depmod.sh
> +++ b/scripts/depmod.sh
> @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
> #
> # A depmod wrapper used by the toplevel Makefile
>
> -if test $# -ne 3; then
> - echo "Usage: $0 /sbin/depmod <kernelrelease> <symbolprefix>" >&2
> +if test $# -ne 2; then
> + echo "Usage: $0 /sbin/depmod <kernelrelease>" >&2
> exit 1
> fi
> DEPMOD=$1
> --
> 2.17.0
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists