linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180516172601.03188b22@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 17:26:01 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree

Hi Masahiro,

On Wed, 16 May 2018 15:01:38 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
> How should I handle your fix-up?
> 
> May I squash into the original one if you ack to do it,
> or is it better to keep it as a separate patch?

Either way is fine by me, but the former reduces the bisection gap.  So
it depends on whether you want to rebase your tree or not.

Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped