linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNATLOynDva0M4LkmubTY1492G_7uabREwiUEUh_rRkkruA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 May 2018 22:45:29 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree

Stephen,

2018-05-16 16:26 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>:
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> On Wed, 16 May 2018 15:01:38 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>>
>> How should I handle your fix-up?
>>
>> May I squash into the original one if you ack to do it,
>> or is it better to keep it as a separate patch?
>
> Either way is fine by me, but the former reduces the bisection gap.  So
> it depends on whether you want to rebase your tree or not.
>
> Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>

Thanks!  Squashed now.




> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada