linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the pinctrl tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXhE8WZnL5fR9pvDkMDVrRXQdajL0r=113eHuK9RKoigw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 19:40:43 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the pinctrl tree

Hi Linus,

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>>> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>>> Commit
>>>>>
>>>>>   f18fab4bcb4f ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add r8a77470 PFC support")
>>>>>
>>>>> is missing a Signed-off-by from its comitter.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I forgot to add it.
>>>>
>>>> Linus, as the merge of sh-pfc is your top commit, shall I fix it up
>>>> and send a new
>>>> pull request?
>>>> Please let me know how to proceed. Thanks!
>>>
>>> If it's just missing your SoB I can add it with your permission
>>> I guess? That is less trouble.
>>
>> You have my permission.
>> But I'm afraid that won't help, as then you'll become the committer with your
>> SoB missing...
>
> Bah I just sign them all off then. It's still quicker.
>
> Done!

Thanks! I'll be more careful next time.

I guess I should base my next pull request on the new commit
73dacc3403436fc2 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add r8a77470 PFC support") in your
tree, instead of on my previous pull request? Else there will be some
conflicts (I checked: so far in one file only).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds