linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the pinctrl tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYH5ik_TJeouGh0CfhM8Kt=p7Sr3pUceVPBBjEGS2rZ_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 May 2018 11:49:29 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the pinctrl tree

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:

> I guess I should base my next pull request on the new commit
> 73dacc3403436fc2 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add r8a77470 PFC support") in your
> tree, instead of on my previous pull request? Else there will be some
> conflicts (I checked: so far in one file only).

Yeah that should work. I try not to rebase my tree too much,
sometimes it happens anyway. This commit should be stable
and nice.

Yours,
Linus Walleij