[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180516.141738.494765267490482500.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 14:17:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: Allow more drivers with COMPILE_TEST
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 14:15:14 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 16:48:22 -0700
>
>> This patch series includes more drivers to be build tested with COMPILE_TEST
>> enabled. This helps cover some of the issues I just ran into with missing
>> a driver *sigh*.
>
> Thank you for doing this.
>
> Series applied.
Actually, I have to revert.
The FEC driver cannot be built tested without the appropriate platform
specific register set defines and x86-64 for example won't provide that.
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c: In function ‘fec_restart’:
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c:959:26: error: ‘FEC_RACC’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘FEC_RXIC0’?
val = readl(fep->hwp + FEC_RACC);
^~~~~~~~
FEC_RXIC0
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c:959:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c:968:38: error: ‘FEC_FTRL’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘FEC_ECNTRL’?
writel(PKT_MAXBUF_SIZE, fep->hwp + FEC_FTRL);
^~~~~~~~
FEC_ECNTRL
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists