[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25dbb8c1-631f-c810-4d75-349a0b291cf8@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 16:03:15 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To: Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jia.he@...-semitech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: add WARN_ON if size is not PAGE_SIZE
aligned in unmap_stage2_range
On 17/05/18 13:46, Jia He wrote:
> Hi Suzuki
>
> On 5/17/2018 4:17 PM, Suzuki K Poulose Wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jia,
>>
>> On 17/05/18 07:11, Jia He wrote:
>>> I ever met a panic under memory pressure tests(start 20 guests and run
>>> memhog in the host).
>>
>> Please avoid using "I" in the commit description and preferably stick to
>> an objective description.
>
> Thanks for the pointing
>
>>
>>>
>>> The root cause might be what I fixed at [1]. But from arm kvm points of
>>> view, it would be better we caught the exception earlier and clearer.
>>>
>>> If the size is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, unmap_stage2_range might unmap the
>>> wrong(more or less) page range. Hence it caused the "BUG: Bad page
>>> state"
>>
>> I don't see why we should ever panic with a "positive" size value. Anyways,
>> the unmap requests must be in units of pages. So this check might be useful.
>>
>>
>
> good question,
>
> After further digging, maybe we need to harden the break condition as below?
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> index 7f6a944..dac9b2e 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static void unmap_stage2_ptes(struct kvm *kvm, pmd_t *pmd,
>
> put_page(virt_to_page(pte));
> }
> - } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
> + } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr < end);
I don't think this change is need as stage2_pgd_addr_end(addr, end) must return
the smaller of the next entry or end. Thus we can't miss "addr" == "end".
Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists