[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551c4ecc-412a-7087-8664-6e4b213bca17@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 09:52:27 +0800
From: Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jia.he@...-semitech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: add WARN_ON if size is not PAGE_SIZE
aligned in unmap_stage2_range
Hi Suzuki
On 5/17/2018 11:03 PM, Suzuki K Poulose Wrote:
> On 17/05/18 13:46, Jia He wrote:
>> Hi Suzuki
>>
>> On 5/17/2018 4:17 PM, Suzuki K Poulose Wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jia,
>>>
>>> On 17/05/18 07:11, Jia He wrote:
>>>> I ever met a panic under memory pressure tests(start 20 guests and run
>>>> memhog in the host).
>>>
>>> Please avoid using "I" in the commit description and preferably stick to
>>> an objective description.
>>
>> Thanks for the pointing
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The root cause might be what I fixed at [1]. But from arm kvm points of
>>>> view, it would be better we caught the exception earlier and clearer.
>>>>
>>>> If the size is not PAGE_SIZE aligned, unmap_stage2_range might unmap the
>>>> wrong(more or less) page range. Hence it caused the "BUG: Bad page
>>>> state"
>>>
>>> I don't see why we should ever panic with a "positive" size value. Anyways,
>>> the unmap requests must be in units of pages. So this check might be useful.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> good question,
>>
>> After further digging, maybe we need to harden the break condition as below?
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> index 7f6a944..dac9b2e 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static void unmap_stage2_ptes(struct kvm *kvm, pmd_t *pmd,
>>
>> put_page(virt_to_page(pte));
>> }
>> - } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
>> + } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr < end);
>
> I don't think this change is need as stage2_pgd_addr_end(addr, end) must return
> the smaller of the next entry or end. Thus we can't miss "addr" == "end".
If it passes addr=202920000,size=fe00 to unmap_stage2_range->
...->unmap_stage2_ptes
unmap_stage2_ptes will get addr=202920000,end=20292fe00
after first while loop addr=202930000, end=20292fe00, then addr!=end
Thus it will touch another pages by put_pages() in the 2nd loop.
--
Cheers,
Jia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists