[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180517202741.GD12497@krava>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 22:27:41 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>, jolsa@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Support multiple events without group
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 01:27:50PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, May 10, 2018 at 09:59:22PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
> > See example,
> >
> > perf record -e cycles,branches ./div
> > perf annotate main --stdio or
> > perf annotate main --stdio2 or
> > perf annotate main
> >
> > The "perf annotate" should show both cycles and branches on the
> > left side, but actually it only shows one event cycles.
> >
> > It works with events group like:
> > perf record -e "{cycles,branches}" ./div
> >
> > It should work too even without group.
>
> Humm, I think that this should be done the way it is for perf report,
> i.e. you select the group output by using --group, no?
>
> Jiri, isn't that how it is done in 'perf report' for non-explicit
> groups?
yep, if there's no event group, the --group will enable the group
output in report.. sounds ok to follow this also in annotate
'perf report' TUI offers list of events to choose from
and the --stdio version prints report for each event
annotate could do the same
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists