lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 08:28:09 +0800
From:   "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Support multiple events without group



On 5/18/2018 4:27 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 01:27:50PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Thu, May 10, 2018 at 09:59:22PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
>>> See example,
>>>
>>> perf record -e cycles,branches ./div
>>> perf annotate main --stdio or
>>> perf annotate main --stdio2 or
>>> perf annotate main
>>>
>>> The "perf annotate" should show both cycles and branches on the
>>> left side, but actually it only shows one event cycles.
>>>
>>> It works with events group like:
>>> perf record -e "{cycles,branches}" ./div
>>>
>>> It should work too even without group.
>>
>> Humm, I think that this should be done the way it is for perf report,
>> i.e. you select the group output by using --group, no?
>>
>> Jiri, isn't that how it is done in 'perf report' for non-explicit
>> groups?
> 
> yep, if there's no event group, the --group will enable the group
> output in report.. sounds ok to follow this also in annotate
> 
> 'perf report' TUI offers list of events to choose from
> and the --stdio version prints report for each event
> annotate could do the same
> 
> jirka
> 

Hi Jiri, Arnaldo,

OK, thanks, I will look at --group and see how it works.

Yes, using a unified interface (--group) for non-explicit groups is a 
good choice.

Thanks
Jin Yao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ