[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180518064626.3f79e30f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 06:46:26 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
0-Day Mailing List <lkp@...ts.01.org>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: a new pending-fixes branch
Hi Sasha,
On Thu, 17 May 2018 17:42:49 +0000 Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 02:35:23PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >As an outcome of some discussion, I have added a pending-fixes branch
> >to linux-next. This branch contains Linus' tree merged with branches
> >containing only fixes pending for the current release. The branch is a
> >strict subset of linux-next each day (as so rebases like linux-next
> >does).
>
> will you be keeping a history of this branch like the linux-next history
> tree?
I hadn't intended to. Do you think it would be useful/necessary? The
commits themselves will be in the linux-next history tree, just not a
separate branch name.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists