linux-kernel - Re: Revert "dmaengine: pl330: add DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180518072112.GG2932@vkoul-mobl>
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 12:51:12 +0530
From:   Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     Frank Mori Hess <fmh6jj@...il.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        r.baldyga@...kerion.com, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Revert "dmaengine: pl330: add DMA_PAUSE feature"

On 18-05-18, 08:28, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> Okay, I see that in theory, there are some tricky bits in implementing DMA
> support in UART drivers. On the other hand there are already drivers 
> with seems
> to be working fine. This discussion is about revert of the feature 
> present in
> pl330 driver, which is required by other in-kernel driver without proper 
> fix to
> them.
> 
> Can we drop it for now and discuss what and how should be implemented to 
> make
> everyone happy, without any regressions?

Sure am dropping the revert, we can always bring it back if it is required

-- 
~Vinod