linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 02/12] drivers: base: cacheinfo: setup DT cache properties early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <90f9c7c6-b7ae-9e23-3e15-eec44ba39703@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 May 2018 11:15:13 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
        vkilari@...eaurora.org, Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, austinwc@...eaurora.org,
        tnowicki@...iumnetworks.com, jhugo@...eaurora.org,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/12] drivers: base: cacheinfo: setup DT cache
 properties early



On 21/05/18 10:27, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 18/05/18 22:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is below patch does what you were looking for ?
>>
>> Somewhat.
>> See below for some minors.
>>
> 
> Thanks
> 
>>> of_property_read_u64 searches for a property in a device node and read
>>> a 64-bit value from it. Instead of using of_get_property to get the
>>> property and then read 64-bit value using of_read_number, we can make
>>> use of of_property_read_u64.
>>
>> Suggested-by?
>>
> 
> Yes indeed, added it locally after I sent out this patch. Will send out
> a proper patch soon.
> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>>
>>
>>> -       cache_size = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL);
>>> -       if (cache_size)
>>> -               this_leaf->size = of_read_number(cache_size, 1);
>>> +       if (!of_property_read_u64(np, propname, &cache_size))
>>> +               this_leaf->size = cache_size;
>>
>> I suppose it's something like this
>>
>> ret = of_property_...(..., &this_leaf->VAR);
>> if (ret)
>>  warning / set default / etc
> 
> OK, I do prefer this but once I was told not to use structure elements
> directly like that, but should be harmless in this particular case, will
> do so. 
> 

I spoke too early, I need to retain local u64 variable otherwise we get
incompatible pointer type(expected 'u64 *' but argument is of type
‘unsigned int *’) error with Werror=incompatible-pointer-types.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep