[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1526898749-17263-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 11:32:29 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drivers: base: cacheinfo: use OF property_read_u64 instead of get_property,read_number
of_property_read_u64 searches for a property in a device node and read
a 64-bit value from it. Instead of using of_get_property to get the
property and then read 64-bit value using of_read_number, we can
simplify it by using of_property_read_u64.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
---
drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
index 2880e2ab01f5..6704563a9339 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
@@ -74,52 +74,50 @@ static inline int get_cacheinfo_idx(enum cache_type type)
static void cache_size(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, struct device_node *np)
{
const char *propname;
- const __be32 *cache_size;
+ u64 cache_size;
int ct_idx;
ct_idx = get_cacheinfo_idx(this_leaf->type);
propname = cache_type_info[ct_idx].size_prop;
- cache_size = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL);
- if (cache_size)
- this_leaf->size = of_read_number(cache_size, 1);
+ if (!of_property_read_u64(np, propname, &cache_size))
+ this_leaf->size = cache_size;
}
/* not cache_line_size() because that's a macro in include/linux/cache.h */
static void cache_get_line_size(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
struct device_node *np)
{
- const __be32 *line_size;
int i, lim, ct_idx;
ct_idx = get_cacheinfo_idx(this_leaf->type);
lim = ARRAY_SIZE(cache_type_info[ct_idx].line_size_props);
for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
+ int ret;
+ u64 line_size;
const char *propname;
propname = cache_type_info[ct_idx].line_size_props[i];
- line_size = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL);
- if (line_size)
+ ret = of_property_read_u64(np, propname, &line_size);
+ if (!ret) {
+ this_leaf->coherency_line_size = line_size;
break;
+ }
}
-
- if (line_size)
- this_leaf->coherency_line_size = of_read_number(line_size, 1);
}
static void cache_nr_sets(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, struct device_node *np)
{
const char *propname;
- const __be32 *nr_sets;
+ u64 nr_sets;
int ct_idx;
ct_idx = get_cacheinfo_idx(this_leaf->type);
propname = cache_type_info[ct_idx].nr_sets_prop;
- nr_sets = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL);
- if (nr_sets)
- this_leaf->number_of_sets = of_read_number(nr_sets, 1);
+ if (!of_property_read_u64(np, propname, &nr_sets))
+ this_leaf->number_of_sets = nr_sets;
}
static void cache_associativity(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists