[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZAdhAn97iWPsym_K+A8iVwa3tRacpeEu=J6C=b+xAO6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 10:29:20 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Hoan Tran <hotran@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Michel Pollet <michel.pollet@...renesas.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] gpio: dwapb: Add support for 1 interrupt per port A GPIO
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Phil Edworthy
<phil.edworthy@...esas.com> wrote:
> The DesignWare GPIO IP can be configured for either 1 interrupt or 1
> per GPIO in port A, but the driver currently only supports 1 interrupt.
> See the DesignWare DW_apb_gpio Databook description of the
> 'GPIO_INTR_IO' parameter.
>
> This change allows the driver to work with up to 32 interrupts, it will
> get as many interrupts as specified in the DT 'interrupts' property.
> It doesn't do anything clever with the different interrupts, it just calls
> the same handler used for single interrupt hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> ---
> One point to mention is that I have made it possible for users to have
> unconnected interrupts by specifying holes in the list of interrupts. This is
> done by supporting the interrupts-extended DT prop.
> However, I have no use for this and had to hack some test case for this.
> Perhaps the driver should support 1 interrupt or all GPIOa as interrupts?
>
> v6:
> - Treat DT and ACPI the same as much as possible. Note that we can't use
> platform_get_irq() to get the DT interrupts as they are in the port
> sub-node and hence do not have an associated platform device.
I already applied this patch in some version, can you check what is
in my devel branch and send incremental patches on top if
something needs changing?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/commit/?h=devel&id=e6ca26abd37606ba4864f20c85d3fe4a2173b93f
Sorry for not knowing by heart what was applied or when, it's
just too much for me sometimes.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists