[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV2VwoD3Le=T4-+Ek2E9tL+hmiR0r4cXxG9EH4GXV-uTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 10:50:27 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Move enable-method to CPU nodes
Hi Simon,
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 03:29:25PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> According to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt, the
>> "enable-method" property should be a property of the individual CPU
>> nodes, not of the parent "cpus" node. However, on R-Car M2-W (and on
>> several other arm32 SoCs), the property is tied to the "cpus" node
>> instead.
>>
>> Secondary CPU bringup and CPU hot (un)plug work regardless, as
>> arm_dt_init_cpu_maps() falls back to looking in the "cpus" node.
>>
>> The cpuidle code does not have such a fallback, so it does not detect
>> the enable-method. Note that cpuidle does not support the
>> "renesas,apmu" enable-method yet, so for now this does not make any
>> difference.
>
> Is the implication that if we keep the current binding for cpu nodes
> then at some point we will need to update the cpuidle binding?
If we keep the current binding for cpu nodes, we indeed have to update
(common) Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt.
In addition, if we want to add renesas,apmu-based cpuidle support later,
we will have to update the common cpuidle code to look in /cpus, too.
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>> ---
>> Arm64 and powerpc do not have such a fallback, but SH has, like arm32.
>>
>> This is marked RFC, as the alternative is to update the DT bindings to
>> keep the status quo.
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
>> index d568bd22d6cbd855..b214cb8f52e47109 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
>> @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@
>> cpus {
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <0>;
>> - enable-method = "renesas,apmu";
>>
>> cpu0: cpu@0 {
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> @@ -83,6 +82,7 @@
>> clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
>> power-domains = <&sysc R8A7791_PD_CA15_CPU0>;
>> next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
>> + enable-method = "renesas,apmu";
>>
>> /* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
>> operating-points = <1500000 1000000>,
>> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@
>> clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7791_CLK_Z>;
>> power-domains = <&sysc R8A7791_PD_CA15_CPU1>;
>> next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
>> + enable-method = "renesas,apmu";
>> };
>>
>> L2_CA15: cache-controller-0 {
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists