linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sched: don't disable bh when accessing action idr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVMFSxnN6dEi0U4=aw7s7TcJ88ShiNTDXcoRUVL82jTZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 May 2018 18:10:28 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sched: don't disable bh when accessing
 action idr

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com> wrote:
> Initial net_device implementation used ingress_lock spinlock to synchronize
> ingress path of device. This lock was used in both process and bh context.
> In some code paths action map lock was obtained while holding ingress_lock.
> Commit e1e992e52faa ("[NET_SCHED] protect action config/dump from irqs")
> modified actions to always disable bh, while using action map lock, in
> order to prevent deadlock on ingress_lock in softirq. This lock was removed
> from net_device, so disabling bh, while accessing action map, is no longer
> necessary.
>
> Replace all action idr spinlock usage with regular calls that do not
> disable bh.

While your patch is probably fine, the above justification seems not.

In the past, tc actions could be released in BH context because tc
filters use call_rcu(). However, I moved them to a workqueue recently.
So before my change I don't think you can remove the BH protection,
otherwise race with idr_remove()...