| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c96fbf7f-edfa-29c0-2364-31e943737500@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 14:11:38 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: let fstrim issue discard commands in lower
priority
On 2018/5/26 3:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> The fstrim gathers huge number of large discard commands, and tries to issue
> without IO awareness, which results in long user-perceive IO latencies on
> READ, WRITE, and FLUSH in UFS. We've observed some of commands take several
> seconds due to long discard latency.
>
> This patch limits the maximum size to 2MB per candidate, and check IO congestion
> when issuing them to disk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> Change log from v1:
> - wait all discard bios in put_super & congested case in trimfs
>
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 +-
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 3cc56b4df03f..6e0677aff8ca 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ enum {
>
> #define MAX_DISCARD_BLOCKS(sbi) BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi)
> #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST 8 /* issue 8 discards per round */
> +#define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_LEN 512 /* Max. 2MB per discard */
> #define DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME 50 /* 50 ms, if exists */
> #define DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME 500 /* 500 ms, if device busy */
> #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME 60000 /* 60 s, if no candidates */
> @@ -698,7 +699,8 @@ static inline void set_extent_info(struct extent_info *ei, unsigned int fofs,
> static inline bool __is_discard_mergeable(struct discard_info *back,
> struct discard_info *front)
> {
> - return back->lstart + back->len == front->lstart;
> + return (back->lstart + back->len == front->lstart) &&
> + (back->len + front->len < DEF_MAX_DISCARD_LEN);
> }
>
> static inline bool __is_discard_back_mergeable(struct discard_info *cur,
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index c67d92bf2968..0150719e580d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1139,68 +1139,6 @@ static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> - struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
> - unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
> -{
> - struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> - struct discard_cmd *prev_dc = NULL, *next_dc = NULL;
> - struct rb_node **insert_p = NULL, *insert_parent = NULL;
> - struct discard_cmd *dc;
> - struct blk_plug plug;
> - int issued;
> -
> -next:
> - issued = 0;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> - f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !__check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
> -
> - dc = (struct discard_cmd *)__lookup_rb_tree_ret(&dcc->root,
> - NULL, start,
> - (struct rb_entry **)&prev_dc,
> - (struct rb_entry **)&next_dc,
> - &insert_p, &insert_parent, true);
> - if (!dc)
> - dc = next_dc;
> -
> - blk_start_plug(&plug);
> -
> - while (dc && dc->lstart <= end) {
> - struct rb_node *node;
> -
> - if (dc->len < dpolicy->granularity)
> - goto skip;
> -
> - if (dc->state != D_PREP) {
> - list_move_tail(&dc->list, &dcc->fstrim_list);
> - goto skip;
> - }
> -
> - __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
> -
> - if (++issued >= dpolicy->max_requests) {
> - start = dc->lstart + dc->len;
> -
> - blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> - mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> -
> - schedule();
> -
> - goto next;
> - }
> -skip:
> - node = rb_next(&dc->rb_node);
> - dc = rb_entry_safe(node, struct discard_cmd, rb_node);
> -
> - if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> - mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> -}
> -
> static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct discard_policy *dpolicy)
> {
> @@ -1341,7 +1279,18 @@ static unsigned int __wait_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> static void __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct discard_policy *dpolicy)
> {
> - __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, dpolicy, 0, UINT_MAX);
> + struct discard_policy dp;
> +
> + if (dpolicy) {
> + __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, dpolicy, 0, UINT_MAX);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* wait all */
> + init_discard_policy(&dp, DPOLICY_FSTRIM, 1);
> + __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
> + init_discard_policy(&dp, DPOLICY_UMOUNT, 1);
> + __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dp, 0, UINT_MAX);
> }
>
> /* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
> @@ -1389,8 +1338,9 @@ bool f2fs_wait_discard_bios(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> init_discard_policy(&dpolicy, DPOLICY_UMOUNT, dcc->discard_granularity);
> __issue_discard_cmd(sbi, &dpolicy);
> dropped = __drop_discard_cmd(sbi);
> - __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, &dpolicy);
>
> + /* just to make sure there is no pending discard commands */
> + __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, NULL);
> return dropped;
> }
>
> @@ -2397,6 +2347,67 @@ bool exist_trim_candidates(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> return has_candidate;
> }
>
> +static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> + struct discard_policy *dpolicy,
> + unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
> +{
> + struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> + struct discard_cmd *prev_dc = NULL, *next_dc = NULL;
> + struct rb_node **insert_p = NULL, *insert_parent = NULL;
> + struct discard_cmd *dc;
> + struct blk_plug plug;
> + int issued;
> +
> +next:
> + issued = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !__check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
> +
> + dc = (struct discard_cmd *)__lookup_rb_tree_ret(&dcc->root,
> + NULL, start,
> + (struct rb_entry **)&prev_dc,
> + (struct rb_entry **)&next_dc,
> + &insert_p, &insert_parent, true);
> + if (!dc)
> + dc = next_dc;
> +
> + blk_start_plug(&plug);
> +
> + while (dc && dc->lstart <= end) {
> + struct rb_node *node;
> +
> + if (dc->len < dpolicy->granularity)
> + goto skip;
> +
> + if (dc->state != D_PREP) {
> + list_move_tail(&dc->list, &dcc->fstrim_list);
> + goto skip;
> + }
> +
> + __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
> +
> + if (++issued >= dpolicy->max_requests) {
> + start = dc->lstart + dc->len;
> +
> + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> + mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> + __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, NULL);
We need to propagate return value from __wait_discard_cmd_range to
__wait_all_discard_cmd, and then stat trimmed block count with return value of
__wait_all_discard_cmd, otherwise, we will get wrong trimmed block count in
f2fs_trim_fs.
Thanks,
> + congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
> + goto next;
> + }
> +skip:
> + node = rb_next(&dc->rb_node);
> + dc = rb_entry_safe(node, struct discard_cmd, rb_node);
> +
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> + mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> +}
> +
> int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range)
> {
> __u64 start = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(range->start);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists