linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] Generic radix trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 26 May 2018 01:56:01 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
To:     Liu Bo <obuil.liubo@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, dev@...nvswitch.org, shli@...nel.org,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Generic radix trees

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:16:42AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Returns pointer to the specified byte @offset within @radix, allocating it if
> > + * necessary - newly allocated slots are always zeroed out:
> > + */
> > +void *__genradix_ptr_alloc(struct __genradix *radix, size_t offset,
> > +                          gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +{
> > +       struct genradix_node **n;
> 
> Any reason that " struct genradix_node ** " is used here instead of "
> struct genradix_node * "?
> 
> Looks like this function only manipulates *n, am I missing something?

It stores to *n, when it has to allocate a node (including the root)