lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 09:48:20 +0800
From:   Liu Bo <obuil.liubo@...il.com>
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, dev@...nvswitch.org, shli@...nel.org,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Generic radix trees

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Kent Overstreet
<kent.overstreet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:16:42AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> > +/*
>> > + * Returns pointer to the specified byte @offset within @radix, allocating it if
>> > + * necessary - newly allocated slots are always zeroed out:
>> > + */
>> > +void *__genradix_ptr_alloc(struct __genradix *radix, size_t offset,
>> > +                          gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct genradix_node **n;
>>
>> Any reason that " struct genradix_node ** " is used here instead of "
>> struct genradix_node * "?
>>
>> Looks like this function only manipulates *n, am I missing something?
>
> It stores to *n, when it has to allocate a node (including the root)

I see, thanks for the explanation.

thanks,
liubo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ