lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180528141537.GA30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 15:15:37 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        james.morris@...rosoft.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] signal: flatten do_send_sig_info()

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 03:49:13PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Let's return early when lock_task_sighand() fails and move send_signal()
> and unlock_task_sighand() out of the if block.

Why is it an improvement?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ