[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180528141537.GA30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 15:15:37 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
james.morris@...rosoft.com, keescook@...omium.org,
peterz@...radead.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] signal: flatten do_send_sig_info()
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 03:49:13PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Let's return early when lock_task_sighand() fails and move send_signal()
> and unlock_task_sighand() out of the if block.
Why is it an improvement?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists