[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180528142005.GB30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 15:20:05 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
james.morris@...rosoft.com, keescook@...omium.org,
peterz@...radead.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] signal: make do_sigpending() void
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 03:49:15PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> do_sigpending() returned 0 unconditionally so it doesn't make sense to have
> it return at all. This allows us to simplify a bunch of syscall callers.
Yeah, that should've been done in "signal: lift sigset size check out of
do_sigpending()" last year; missed that on review back then.
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists