linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180529172611.GL3803@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 10:26:11 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:14:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:09:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> >> <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >> > There are macros for static initializer for the three out of four
> >> > possible notifier types, that are:
> >> >         ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >         BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >         RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >
> >> > This patch provides a static initilizer for the forth type to make it
> >> > complete.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> >>
> >> I cannot apply this without an ACK from Paul.
> >
> > I have both queued, but if you would prefer to take them, then for the
> > SRCU piece:
> >
> > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> I'll route them along with the other cpufreq material then.

Please let me know when you have them queued so that I can remove
them from -rcu.

							Thanx, Paul