[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j_O=nL6Eym5GqGGDC8LPB5vu-YAp9DFfZSJsHd-TMEmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 19:14:49 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:09:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
>> <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> > There are macros for static initializer for the three out of four
>> > possible notifier types, that are:
>> > ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
>> > BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
>> > RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
>> >
>> > This patch provides a static initilizer for the forth type to make it
>> > complete.
>> >
>> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
>>
>> I cannot apply this without an ACK from Paul.
>
> I have both queued, but if you would prefer to take them, then for the
> SRCU piece:
>
> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks!
I'll route them along with the other cpufreq material then.
Cheers,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists