linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 13:09:57 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:14:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Paul E. McKenney
>> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:09:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
>> >> <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> >> > There are macros for static initializer for the three out of four
>> >> > possible notifier types, that are:
>> >> >         ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
>> >> >         BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
>> >> >         RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
>> >> >
>> >> > This patch provides a static initilizer for the forth type to make it
>> >> > complete.
>> >> >
>> >> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
>> >>
>> >> I cannot apply this without an ACK from Paul.
>> >
>> > I have both queued, but if you would prefer to take them, then for the
>> > SRCU piece:
>> >
>> > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> I'll route them along with the other cpufreq material then.
>
> Please let me know when you have them queued so that I can remove
> them from -rcu.

I've just added them to my linux-next branch.

Cheers,
Rafael