lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 7 Jun 2018 00:32:52 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/SRCU: provide a static initializer

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:09:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:14:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> >> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:09:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> >> >> <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >> >> > There are macros for static initializer for the three out of four
> >> >> > possible notifier types, that are:
> >> >> >         ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >> >         BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >> >         RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This patch provides a static initilizer for the forth type to make it
> >> >> > complete.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> >> >>
> >> >> I cannot apply this without an ACK from Paul.
> >> >
> >> > I have both queued, but if you would prefer to take them, then for the
> >> > SRCU piece:
> >> >
> >> > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> I'll route them along with the other cpufreq material then.
> >
> > Please let me know when you have them queued so that I can remove
> > them from -rcu.
> 
> I've just added them to my linux-next branch.

And I have removed them, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ