linux-kernel - Re: Regression in Linux next again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180530140318eucas1p2af2d01b9678e8914c2b8e099c584ec11~zcQzVKtj30757607576eucas1p2V@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 16:03:15 +0200
From:   Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Carlos Hernandez <ceh@...com>
Subject: Re: Regression in Linux next again


On 05/30/2018 11:13 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 03:15:01PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> 
>> I think I bisected this same issue for the second time now
>> but for a different merge window. What's up with that?
> 
> Last time we just reverted it as Maciej was unable to reproduce your
> problem, he's tried again with some alterations.
> 
>> Reverting both patches fixes the issue for me. I could
>> not debug it further because of the compile error(s).
> 
> OK, unless this gets fixed really quickly I'll revert again.
> 

I'm afraid, I have no idea, how to fix it quickly. You can revert it and
in the next version I'll fix the build error and split the last patch even
more, so we could perform a more precise bisection. I'd be grateful if you
could push it on your test coupled branch and Tony could test it again before
merging it with next again.

Best regards,

Maciej Purski