linux-kernel - Re: Regression in Linux next again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180530143338.GM6920@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 15:33:38 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Carlos Hernandez <ceh@...com>
Subject: Re: Regression in Linux next again

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:03:15PM +0200, Maciej Purski wrote:

> I'm afraid, I have no idea, how to fix it quickly. You can revert it and
> in the next version I'll fix the build error and split the last patch even
> more, so we could perform a more precise bisection. I'd be grateful if you
> could push it on your test coupled branch and Tony could test it again before
> merging it with next again.

Yeah, if we could get testing from Tony first that'd be ideal.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)