linux-kernel - Re: Regression in Linux next again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180530144505.GB5705@atomide.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 07:45:05 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Carlos Hernandez <ceh@...com>
Subject: Re: Regression in Linux next again

* Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> [180530 14:36]:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:03:15PM +0200, Maciej Purski wrote:
> 
> > I'm afraid, I have no idea, how to fix it quickly. You can revert it and
> > in the next version I'll fix the build error and split the last patch even
> > more, so we could perform a more precise bisection. I'd be grateful if you
> > could push it on your test coupled branch and Tony could test it again before
> > merging it with next again.
> 
> Yeah, if we could get testing from Tony first that'd be ideal.

I can boot test the patches easily no problem. Maciej, maybe email
me some debug version and I'll email you back the dmesg output.

Regards,

Tony