linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] clk: davinci: outstanding fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180530200947.982.19495@harbor.lan>
Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 13:09:50 -0700
From:   Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] clk: davinci: outstanding fixes

Hi David,

Quoting David Lechner (2018-05-25 11:11:41)
> This is a resend of all of the outstanding DaVinci clock patches plus one new
> patch. All of the patches (except the new one) have been reviewed and tested
> by someone other than me.
> 
> The new patch ("clk: davinci: Fix link errors when not all SoCs are enabled")
> should be fairly trivial.
> 
> I am resending them all in one series to hopefully make it easier to get them
> picked up by having them in the correct order to avoid merge conflicts. This
> series is based on the clk/clk-davinci-psc-da830 branch.

I picked them all and pushed to clk/clk-davinci based on -rc1. There are
some comments on the individual patches, all of which are of the "please
revisit this and fix it up later" variety.

Going forward I'm happy for you and/or Sekhar to send clk PRs to Stephen
and myself. The same rules apply for PRs: all patches need to be posted
to the list the old fashioned way for review. But PRs make our lives a
bit easier, especially when dealing with chip variants from the same SoC
family like we have with davinci.

Best regards,
Mike

> 
> David Lechner (7):
>   clk: davinci: pll-dm355: drop pll2_sysclk2
>   clk: davinci: pll-dm355: fix SYSCLKn parent names
>   clk: davinci: psc-dm355: fix ASP0/1 clkdev lookups
>   clk: davinci: pll: allow dev == NULL
>   clk: davinci: da850-pll: change PLL0 to CLK_OF_DECLARE
>   clk: davinci: psc: allow for dev == NULL
>   clk: davinci: Fix link errors when not all SoCs are enabled
> 
> Sekhar Nori (2):
>   clk: davinci: pll-dm646x: keep PLL2 SYSCLK1 always enabled
>   clk: davinci: psc-dm365: fix few clocks
> 
>  drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da830.c  |   5 +-
>  drivers/clk/davinci/pll-da850.c  |  37 ++--
>  drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm355.c  |  22 ++-
>  drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm365.c  |   9 +-
>  drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm644x.c |   9 +-
>  drivers/clk/davinci/pll-dm646x.c |  11 +-
>  drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c        | 299 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/clk/davinci/pll.h        |  41 +++--
>  drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm355.c  |   7 +-
>  drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm365.c  |  22 ++-
>  drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm644x.c |   3 +-
>  drivers/clk/davinci/psc-dm646x.c |   3 +-
>  drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c        |  72 ++++++--
>  drivers/clk/davinci/psc.h        |  12 ++
>  include/linux/clk/davinci.h      |  40 +++++
>  15 files changed, 418 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/clk/davinci.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.0
>