linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] clk: davinci: outstanding fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8f188ff5-50d1-f128-ecc5-d25edda325d4@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 10:13:40 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] clk: davinci: outstanding fixes

On Thursday 31 May 2018 01:39 AM, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> Quoting David Lechner (2018-05-25 11:11:41)
>> This is a resend of all of the outstanding DaVinci clock patches plus one new
>> patch. All of the patches (except the new one) have been reviewed and tested
>> by someone other than me.
>>
>> The new patch ("clk: davinci: Fix link errors when not all SoCs are enabled")
>> should be fairly trivial.
>>
>> I am resending them all in one series to hopefully make it easier to get them
>> picked up by having them in the correct order to avoid merge conflicts. This
>> series is based on the clk/clk-davinci-psc-da830 branch.
> 
> I picked them all and pushed to clk/clk-davinci based on -rc1. There are
> some comments on the individual patches, all of which are of the "please
> revisit this and fix it up later" variety.
> 
> Going forward I'm happy for you and/or Sekhar to send clk PRs to Stephen
> and myself. The same rules apply for PRs: all patches need to be posted
> to the list the old fashioned way for review. But PRs make our lives a
> bit easier, especially when dealing with chip variants from the same SoC
> family like we have with davinci.

Thanks Mike! David is listed as maintainer for drivers/clk/davinci/* and
I believe he can be generating pull requests going forward. I can work
as the backup, of course.

Regards,
Sekhar