lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 17:05:25 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:     <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <zhaohongjiang@...wei.com>, <hare@...e.com>,
        <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <jthumshirn@...e.de>, <hch@....de>,
        <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>, <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>,
        <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>, <tj@...nel.org>, <miaoxie@...wei.com>,
        chenqilin <chenqilin2@...wei.com>,
        Ewan Milne <emilne@...hat.com>, Tomas Henzl <thenzl@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] scsi: libsas: support SATA phy link rate unmatch the
 pathway

On 29/05/2018 03:23, Jason Yan wrote:
> If a SATA disk attached to a expander phy and it's linkrate is greater
> than the expander host phy's linkrate, the disk will failed to discover.
> The topology is like below:
>
>    +----------+           +----------+
>    |          |           |          |
>    |          |-- 3.0 G --|          |-- 6.0 G -- SAS  disk
>    |          |           |          |
>    |          |-- 3.0 G --|          |-- 6.0 G -- SAS  disk
>    |initiator |           |          |
>    | device   |-- 3.0 G --| Expander |-- 6.0 G -- SAS  disk
>    |          |           |          |
>    |          |-- 3.0 G --|          |-- 6.0 G -- SATA disk  -->failed to connect
>    |          |           |          |
>    |          |           |          |-- 6.0 G -- SATA disk  -->failed to connect
>    |          |           |          |
>    +----------+           +----------+
>
> And when we check the sas protocal spec, this scenario is described as
> this:
>
> 7.13 Rate matching
> ......
> If an expander phy attached to a SATA phy is using a physical link rate
> greater than the maximum connection rate supported by the pathway from
> an STP initiator port, a management application client should use the
> SMP PHY CONTROL function (see 10.4.3.10) to set the PROGRAMMED MAXIMUM
> PHYSICAL LINK RATE field of the expander phy to the maximum connection
> rate supported by the pathway from that STP initiator port.
>
> In order to support this scenario, checking the SATA disk's linkrate
> to see if it is greater than any phy's linkrate it may pass through.
> Remember the minimum linkrate of the pathway and set the SATA phy
> linkrate to it using the SMP PHY CONTROL function.

As we (re)discover the tree, can we keep track of the min pathway to the 
root PHY dynamically (per expander), and then take action for any SATA 
devices attached which have a negotiated linkrate greater (than the 
expanders min pathway)? This would be an alternate to your approach of 
finishing discovery and then checking the min pathway as a whole new step.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ