linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] dm writecache: fix return value check in writecache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180531160711.GB11300@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 12:07:12 -0400
From:   Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To:     Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
Cc:     Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] dm writecache: fix return value check in
 writecache_ctr()

On Thu, May 31 2018 at 12:02pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 31 2018 at  7:53am -0400,
> Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
> > Function dm_io_client_create() and dm_kcopyd_client_create() return
> > ERR_PTR() not NULL in case of error. The NULL test in the return value
> > check should be replaced with IS_ERR()
> > 
> > Fixes: 2105231db61b ("dm: add writecache target")
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 10 ++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > index 844c4fb..0b2b436 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > @@ -1872,9 +1872,10 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	wc->dm_io = dm_io_client_create();
> > -	if (!wc->dm_io) {
> > -		r = -ENOMEM;
> > +	if (IS_ERR(wc->dm_io)) {
> > +		r = PTR_ERR(wc->dm_io);
> >  		ti->error = "Unable to allocate dm-io client";
> > +		wc->dm_io = NULL;
> >  		goto bad;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -2096,9 +2097,10 @@ static int writecache_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		wc->dm_kcopyd = dm_kcopyd_client_create(&dm_kcopyd_throttle);
> > -		if (!wc->dm_kcopyd) {
> > -			r = -ENOMEM;
> > +		if (IS_ERR(wc->dm_kcopyd)) {
> > +			r = PTR_ERR(wc->dm_kcopyd);
> >  			ti->error = "Unable to allocate dm-kcopyd client";
> > +			wc->dm_kcopyd = NULL;
> >  			goto bad;
> >  		}
> > 
> 
> 
> Yes, I forgot to pull this in.. it got lost in the shuffle.  Mikulas had
> provided this same change (folded into a larger patch) yesterday, see:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10439345/
> 
> I'll get this folded in ASAP.

Turns out I already did fold it in.  My push to linux-next just missed
today's tree.

So already taken care of.

Thanks for sending the patch though.

Mike