| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:30:00 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: Allow specifying devices using a base bus
and path of devfns
On Thu, 31 May 2018 17:50:09 -0600
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
> When specifying PCI devices on the kernel command line using a
> BDF, the bus numbers can change when adding or replacing a device,
> changing motherboard firmware, or applying kernel parameters like
> pci=assign-buses. When this happens, it is usually undesirable to
> apply whatever command line tweak to the wrong device.
>
> Therefore, it is useful to be able to specify devices with a base
> bus number and the path of devfns needed to get to it. (Similar to
> the "device scope" structure in the Intel VT-d spec, Section 8.3.1.)
>
> Thus, we add an option to specify devices in the following format:
>
> path:[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>/<slot>.<func>[/ ...]
>
> The path can be any segment within the PCI hierarchy of any length and
> determined through the use of 'lspci -t'. When specified this way, it is
> less likely that a renumbered bus will result in a valid device specification
> and the tweak won't be applied to the wrong device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 12 ++-
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index e58cc671ff92..bc51b316f485 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -2989,9 +2989,10 @@
>
> Some options herein operate on a specific device
> or a set of devices (<pci_dev>). These are
> - specified in one of two formats:
> + specified in one of three formats:
>
> [<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>
> + path:[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>/<slot>.<func>[/ ...]
> pci:<vendor>:<device>[:<subvendor>:<subdevice>]
>
> Note: the first format specifies a PCI
> @@ -2999,9 +3000,12 @@
> if new hardware is inserted, if motherboard
> firmware changes, or due to changes caused
> by other kernel parameters. The second format
> - selects devices using IDs from the
> - configuration space which may match multiple
> - devices in the system.
> + specifies a path from a device through
> + a path of multiple slot/function addresses
> + (this is more robust against renumbering
> + issues). The third format selects devices using
> + IDs from the configuration space which may match
> + multiple devices in the system.
>
> earlydump [X86] dump PCI config space before the kernel
> changes anything
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 85fec5e2640b..39f11bd0ee03 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -184,22 +184,111 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ioremap_wc_bar);
> #endif
>
> /**
> + * pci_dev_str_match_path - test if a path string matches a device
> + * @dev: the PCI device to test
> + * @p: string to match the device against
> + * @endptr: pointer to the string after the match
> + *
> + * Test if a string (typically from a kernel parameter) formated as a
> + * path of slot/function addresses matches a PCI device. The string must
> + * be of the form:
> + *
> + * [<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>/<slot>.<func>[/ ...]
> + *
> + * A path for a device can be obtained using 'lspci -t'. Using a path
> + * is more robust against renumbering of devices than using only
> + * a single bus, slot and function address.
> + *
> + * Returns 1 if the string matches the device, 0 if it does not and
> + * a negative error code if it fails to parse the string.
> + */
> +static int pci_dev_str_match_path(struct pci_dev *dev, const char *path,
> + const char **endptr)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int seg, bus, slot, func;
> + char *wpath, *p;
> + char end;
> +
> + *endptr = strchrnul(path, ';');
> +
> + wpath = kmemdup_nul(path, *endptr - path, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!wpath)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + while (1) {
> + p = strrchr(wpath, '/');
> + if (!p)
> + break;
> + ret = sscanf(p, "/%x.%x%c", &slot, &func, &end);
> + if (ret != 2) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_and_exit;
> + }
> +
> + if (dev->devfn != PCI_DEVFN(slot, func)) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto free_and_exit;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Note: we don't need to get a reference to the upstream
> + * bridge because we hold a reference to the top level
> + * device which should hold a reference to the bridge,
> + * and so on.
> + */
> + dev = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> + if (!dev) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto free_and_exit;
> + }
> +
> + *p = 0;
> + }
> +
> + ret = sscanf(wpath, "%x:%x:%x.%x%c", &seg, &bus, &slot,
> + &func, &end);
> + if (ret != 4) {
> + seg = 0;
> + ret = sscanf(wpath, "%x:%x.%x%c", &bus, &slot, &func, &end);
> + if (ret != 3) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_and_exit;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = (seg == pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) &&
> + bus == dev->bus->number &&
> + dev->devfn == PCI_DEVFN(slot, func));
> +
> +free_and_exit:
> + kfree(wpath);
> + return ret;
> +}
Cool, I'm glad this worked. I note though that there's really not much
difference between:
[domain:]bus:slot.fn
and
[domain:]bus:slot.fn[/slot.fn[/slot.fn[/...]]]
IOW, what's defined here as the "path:" specification doesn't require
that we start at a root bus device, it can really specify a path
starting anywhere, including the target device directly. So can we
simply extend domain:bus:slot.fn to support paths without a separate
identifier? Thanks,
Alex
> +
> +/**
> * pci_dev_str_match - test if a string matches a device
> * @dev: the PCI device to test
> * @p: string to match the device against
> * @endptr: pointer to the string after the match
> *
> * Test if a string (typically from a kernel parameter) matches a
> - * specified. The string may be of one of two forms formats:
> + * specified. The string may be of one of three formats:
> *
> * [<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>
> + * path:[<domain>:]<bus>:<slot>.<func>/<slot>.<func>[/ ...]
> * pci:<vendor>:<device>[:<subvendor>:<subdevice>]
> *
> * The first format specifies a PCI bus/slot/function address which
> * may change if new hardware is inserted, if motherboard firmware changes,
> * or due to changes caused in kernel parameters.
> *
> - * The second format matches devices using IDs in the configuration
> + * The second format specifies a PCI bus/slot/function root address and
> + * a path of slot/function addresses to the specific device from the root.
> + * The path for a device can be determined through the use of 'lspci -t'.
> + * This format is more robust against renumbering issues than the first format.
> +
> + * The third format matches devices using IDs in the configuration
> * space which may match multiple devices in the system. A value of 0
> * for any field will match all devices.
> *
> @@ -236,7 +325,15 @@ static int pci_dev_str_match(struct pci_dev *dev, const char *p,
> (!subsystem_device ||
> subsystem_device == dev->subsystem_device))
> goto found;
> + } else if (strncmp(p, "path:", 5) == 0) {
> + /* PCI Root Bus and a path of Slot,Function IDs */
> + p += 5;
>
> + ret = pci_dev_str_match_path(dev, p, &p);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + else if (ret)
> + goto found;
> } else {
> /* PCI Bus,Slot,Function ids are specified */
> ret = sscanf(p, "%x:%x:%x.%x%n", &seg, &bus, &slot,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists