linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic,lock}.h and use on arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:04:22 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic,lock}.h and
 use on arm64

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:40:29AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > This patch series has previously been posted in RFC form here:
> > 
> >   RFCv1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg634719.html
> >   RFCv2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg636875.html
> >      v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg655262.html
> > 
> > The only change since v1 is that some of the fetch ops are replaced
> > by non-value-returning ops for some of the atomic bitops.
> > 
> 
> Looks good,
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

Thanks, Peter!

> How do you want to route this, through tip or the arm64 tree?

I think -tip would make the most sense, if that's ok with Ingo.

Cheers,

Will