[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180604090421.GA9482@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:04:22 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic,lock}.h and
use on arm64
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:40:29AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series has previously been posted in RFC form here:
> >
> > RFCv1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg634719.html
> > RFCv2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg636875.html
> > v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg655262.html
> >
> > The only change since v1 is that some of the fetch ops are replaced
> > by non-value-returning ops for some of the atomic bitops.
> >
>
> Looks good,
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Thanks, Peter!
> How do you want to route this, through tip or the arm64 tree?
I think -tip would make the most sense, if that's ok with Ingo.
Cheers,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists