linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic,lock}.h and use on arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 09:40:29 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic,lock}.h and
 use on arm64

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This patch series has previously been posted in RFC form here:
> 
>   RFCv1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg634719.html
>   RFCv2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg636875.html
>      v1: https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg655262.html
> 
> The only change since v1 is that some of the fetch ops are replaced
> by non-value-returning ops for some of the atomic bitops.
> 

Looks good,

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

How do you want to route this, through tip or the arm64 tree?