lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180604091509.GP12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:15:09 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...enet.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Spectre mitigation doesn't seem to work at all?!

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 10:50:07AM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:

> Ok, this means every program running on the machine has to care itself
> to be spectre v1 - safe.

Correct. Compiler and static analyser teams are looking hard at this to
help.

> A malicious program most probably won't care about that. Therefore, my
> next question is: which memory regions can be exploited by a malicious
> program? The complete physical memory or only the memory provided to the
> malicious program? Should be the latter if this approach should have any
> impact.

It affects the virtual memory of the target process.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ