[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df8e6949-cf69-cca0-0668-7f9505fb38be@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:16:58 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: ohad@...ery.com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, bgoswami@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rohkumar@....qualcomm.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: smd: do not use mananged resources for endpoints
and channels
On 04/06/18 01:49, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 01 Jun 16:32 PDT 2018, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> @@ -1380,11 +1380,13 @@ static void qcom_smd_edge_release(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct qcom_smd_channel *channel;
>> struct qcom_smd_edge *edge = to_smd_edge(dev);
>> + struct list_head *this, *tmp;
>>
>> - list_for_each_entry(channel, &edge->channels, list) {
>> - SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, state, SMD_CHANNEL_CLOSED);
>> - SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, head, 0);
>> - SET_RX_CHANNEL_INFO(channel, tail, 0);
>> + list_for_each_safe(this, tmp, &edge->channels) {
>> + channel = list_entry(this, struct qcom_smd_channel, list);
>
> Is there a reason not to use list_for_each_entry_safe()?
>
No, I will respin the patch with this change.
thanks,
srini
>> + list_del(&channel->list);
>> + kfree(channel->name);
>> + kfree(channel);
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists