linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fixes for v4.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180604200043.GF2691@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2018 23:00:43 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" 
        <tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fixes for v4.4

On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 03:18:58PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:44:38PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Decided to add Enric's commit because it is also a bug fix instead
> > of modifying Chris commit.
> 
> Why just 4.4 and not also 4.9?  I don't want to take patches that would
> cause a regression for people moving from 4.4 to 4.9, so can you also
> provide 4.9 backports of this?  If so, I will be glad to queue up both
> sets of patches.

Yes, I can do this. I'll check the v4.4 change with the original author
as I have to put the check in the original patch into different place
before sending anything (I do not have any POWER systes available to
test it myself).

/Jarkko